A personal note from Casper Zhao
The first book was supposed to be enough.
The argument was clean and complete. The bank has already
formed a view of you before you walk into the room. That view is built from
analyses you have never seen. Every one of those analyses can be reproduced in
advance by anyone willing to do the work. A borrower who has done that work can
sit down with their own financials and construct a reasonable approximation of
the credit memo the bank will write about them.
That was the system. The system covers the ordinary case. An
operating company with a revolving line and a term loan. A relationship manager
who returns calls. A renewal that arrives on schedule every twelve months. Most
banking relationships are that case most of the time.
I believed, when the first book was finished, that the
system was the whole story. I was wrong.
The Tuesday Afternoon
The moment that changed my mind was not a dramatic one. It
was a phone call from a client on a Tuesday afternoon in October.
The client was the CFO of a distribution company doing about
$32 million in revenue. The company had a $4 million revolving line with a
regional bank. The relationship was seven years old. The compliance history was
clean. The grade was a four. The renewal was routine, or should have been.
The CFO said: "The leverage ratio is 4.23 times. The
covenant is 4.00 times. The compliance certificate is due in forty-five days.
What do I do?"
The first book would have told her what the leverage ratio
meant, how the bank computed it, and why the covenant was set where it was. The
first book would have explained the system. The first book would not have told
her what to do in the next forty-eight hours.
What she did, before she called me, was call the
relationship manager. The RM said she would "look into it." The CFO
waited three days. The RM called back and said the file had been flagged for
the credit officer. The credit officer wanted a call. The CFO went into that
call with no preparation, no documentation, and no plan. She explained that the
leverage spike was caused by a one-time legal settlement and a delayed customer
payment. The credit officer asked for a written explanation and a forward
projection. The CFO sent a three-paragraph email and a spreadsheet that showed
EBITDA recovering in the next two quarters.
The bank issued a waiver. The waiver fee was $25,000. The
grade migrated from four to five. The next renewal came with a 35 basis point
pricing increase and a tightened leverage covenant.
The CFO called me after the renewal, not before. She said:
"I feel like I handled that wrong, but I don't know what I should have
done differently."
She was right on both counts. She had handled it wrong. And
the reason she did not know what to do differently was that no book, no
resource, no playbook existed that told her. The first book explained the
system. It did not provide the procedure.
That phone call was the moment I started writing the second
book.
What the First Book Did Not Cover
The first book covered the ordinary case. The ordinary case
is what happens when the system works. The renewal arrives on schedule. The
covenants are in compliance. The grade is stable. The commitment letter arrives
with terms that are within the expected range. The borrower signs it. The
relationship continues.
The ordinary case is most of the relationship, most of the
time. But the ordinary case is not what determines whether the relationship
survives.
The relationship survives or dies in the moments that break
the ordinary case. The covenant violation discovered on a Tuesday afternoon.
The acquisition that has to be financed in six weeks. The term sheet with nine
pages of conditions precedent and no explanation of which three matter. The
personal guarantee that has quietly outlived the loan it was written against.
The credit cycle that turns while the borrower is still operating on last
year's assumptions. The bank merger that changes the credit policy overnight.
The field exam that reduces availability by $600,000 on a Monday morning. The
revolving line that shows zero available on a Tuesday at 2:40 in the afternoon
and payroll is due on Friday.
Those situations do not yield to general principles. They
require specific procedure. And procedure is what the first book did not
provide.
The Gap in the Literature
When I started researching whether a procedural playbook for
advanced commercial borrowers existed, I found three categories of books.
The first category was academic. Textbooks on commercial
lending, credit analysis, and banking regulation. These books are written for
banking students and credit analysts in training. They explain the theory
behind the underwriting process. They do not tell a borrower what to do when
the covenant trips on a Tuesday afternoon. They are not designed to.
The second category was generic. "How to get a business
loan" books aimed at first-time borrowers and small business owners who
have never been through a commercial credit process. These books cover the
basics: what a term sheet is, what a personal guarantee is, what the SBA does.
They do not cover what to do when the bank sends a forbearance agreement at
4:47 on a Friday afternoon with a cover letter requesting execution by the
following Wednesday. They are not designed to.
The third category was legal. Bankruptcy treatises, workout
law handbooks, and UCC Article 9 guides written for attorneys. These books are
technically excellent and practically inaccessible to a borrower who is not a
lawyer. They assume the reader already knows the legal framework and is looking
for the specific case law or statutory interpretation. They do not tell a
borrower when to retain counsel, what type of counsel to retain, or how to
manage the engagement so the matter does not escalate into litigation. They are
not designed to.
The gap was clear. There was no book that sat between the
academic textbook and the legal treatise. No book that said: here is the
specific procedure, with the specific timeline, the specific documentation, and
the specific negotiation sequence, for the specific situation you are facing on
a Tuesday afternoon.
That gap is what this book fills.
What Is Different About This Book
The first book taught the borrower to think like a banker.
This book teaches the borrower to act like one.
The distinction matters. Thinking like a banker means
understanding the analytical framework the bank uses to evaluate the credit.
Acting like a banker means understanding the procedural framework the bank uses
to manage the credit when the analytical framework produces a result the
borrower did not want.
The procedures in this book are not general advice. They are
specific protocols with specific steps, specific timelines, and specific
documentation requirements. The covenant violation playbook tells the borrower
exactly what to do in the first forty-eight hours after discovering a
violation, including which documents to pull, which calculations to verify, and
which letter to draft before the compliance certificate is due. The 72-hour
liquidity lockdown tells the borrower exactly what to do in the first seventy-two
hours after the revolving line shows zero available, including which four
diagnostic categories to check, which 13-week cash forecast to build, and which
vendors to call with which specific message. The forbearance negotiation
framework identifies the eight sections of a standard forbearance agreement and
tells the borrower which provisions are negotiable, which are not, and which
one is an absolute red line that should never be signed.
Each procedure is designed to be executed on the day the
situation arrives. Not after reading the whole book. Not after consulting an
attorney. On the day.
That design choice was deliberate. The borrower who
discovers a covenant violation on a Tuesday afternoon does not have time to
read a book about banking theory. They have time to open the book to Chapter
15, read the forty-eight-hour protocol, and execute it. The borrower who
receives a forbearance draft at 4:47 on a Friday afternoon does not have time
to study the history of forbearance law. They have time to open the book to
Chapter 17, read the eight-section framework, and mark up the draft before the
Wednesday deadline.
The book is organized for reference, not for sequence. The
chapters are self-contained by design. The reader who needs the acquisition
financing framework does not need to read the insurance covenant chapter first.
The reader who needs the multi-lender standstill sequence does not need to read
the relationship lifecycle chapter first. Each chapter opens with the situation
it addresses, provides the procedure, and closes with the tool the reader needs
to execute it.
The Score Card
If I had to pick one tool from the book that I believe will
change the most relationships, it would be the self-rated credit score card in
Chapter 1.
The score card is a five-category, one-hundred-point
framework that lets a borrower approximate the bank's internal risk grade
before the bank completes its own assessment. The five categories are cash flow
coverage, industry conditions, collateral position, capital and guarantor
strength, and character and reporting quality. Each category is worth twenty
points. The composite maps to the bank's grading scale: 90 to 100 is a grade
three, 75 to 89 is a grade four, 60 to 74 is a grade five, 45 to 59 is a grade
six, and below 45 is special assets territory.
The score card is not the bank's model. It is an
approximation of the bank's model, calibrated to be useful to the borrower
rather than to the regulator. It will not produce the same number the bank
produces. It will produce a number that is directionally accurate enough to
tell the borrower whether they are moving toward a better grade or a worse one,
and which specific inputs are driving the movement.
That directionality is the information this book was written
to give.
The borrower who runs the score card quarterly, identifies
the two sub-scores with the lowest point totals, and executes two or three
targeted actions per quarter to improve those sub-scores will see the composite
move. The composite can move one full notch in as few as three quarters when
the borrower is specific about the inputs. I have watched it happen. The
borrower who does not run the score card discovers the grade migration when the
commitment letter arrives with worse terms than the prior year, and believes
the bank acted arbitrarily.
The bank did not act arbitrarily. The bank applied a
framework the borrower could have applied first.
The Relationship Profitability Model
The second tool I would highlight is the relationship
profitability model in Chapter 5.
Two borrowers with identical credit profiles can receive
materially different spreads from different banks. The difference is not in the
credit file. The difference is in the relationship profitability model that
neither borrower has ever seen.
Banks do not price loans in isolation. They price
relationships. The loan is one component of a profitability calculation that
includes deposit income, fee income, capital allocation, loan loss provision,
and servicing cost. A relationship that generates $80,000 of total annual
income for the bank and requires $35,000 of capital cost has a return on
risk-adjusted capital of approximately 129 percent. That is an excellent
banking relationship. A relationship that generates $46,000 of net interest
income only, with no fee income and no deposits, and requires $35,000 of
capital cost, has a return of about 31 percent. The bank keeps that
relationship because it is profitable, but it is the least valuable
relationship in the portfolio.
The borrower who understands this model can reverse-engineer
the bank's pricing. The conversation stops being "your spread is 60 basis
points above the other bank" and becomes "our relationship generates
$101,700 in total annual income against $113,300 in total cost. If we move
$400,000 in additional operating deposits and add lockbox and positive pay, the
relationship profit turns positive and the return improves to 11 percent. At
that contribution level, the 285 basis point spread is supportable."
That conversation is built on the bank's own arithmetic. The
relationship manager who hears it knows the borrower has done the math the bank
does internally. The credit officer who sees the analysis in the pre-meeting
memo knows the borrower is negotiating from the same framework the committee
uses to approve pricing.
The borrower who controls the relationship inputs controls
the pricing conversation. The borrower who does not understand the model argues
about the spread in isolation and loses.
The Compound Effect
The most important argument in the book is the one that is
invisible in any single renewal cycle and decisive across a decade.
Consider two borrowers with identical credit profiles at
year one. Both are grade four. Both have $4.5 million facilities. Both have
leverage ratios of 3.5 times against a 4.0 times covenant. Both have personal
guarantees of $4.5 million. Both have pricing at SOFR plus 275 basis points.
The first borrower manages the relationship reactively. The
compliance certificate is filed on the due date. No management commentary
accompanies it. The renewal meeting is prepared for in the two weeks before it
occurs. The commitment letter is signed without negotiation. The guarantee is
never discussed. The pricing grid is never referenced. The score card is never
run. The forward income statement is never prepared.
The second borrower manages the relationship proactively.
The compliance certificate is filed one week early, accompanied by a one-page
management commentary memo. The score card is run quarterly. The forward income
statement is prepared before every renewal. The pre-meeting memo is delivered
six weeks before the renewal date. The relationship profitability assessment is
presented at every renewal conversation.
By year four, the second borrower has secured a pricing
step-down of 25 basis points because the leverage ratio crossed the grid
threshold and the borrower requested the reduction. The first borrower is still
at SOFR plus 275 because the bank did not volunteer the step-down and the
borrower did not ask.
By year six, the second borrower has negotiated a seasonal
covenant amendment that accommodates the Q3 leverage peak, eliminating the
annual waiver conversation. The second borrower has also negotiated a capped
guarantee at 75 percent of the outstanding balance, reducing personal exposure
by $1.1 million. The first borrower still has a full unlimited continuing
guarantee.
By year eight, the second borrower has secured a two-year
maturity commitment. The first borrower is still on annual renewal. The second
borrower's grade has migrated to a three. The first borrower is still at a
four.
By year ten, the second borrower has accumulated
approximately $180,000 in interest savings and has reduced personal guarantee
exposure by $2.2 million. The second borrower has spent approximately 21 hours
per year on the internal credit function, totaling 210 hours across the decade.
The first borrower has spent approximately 8 hours per year, totaling 80 hours.
The difference is 130 hours of work across ten years. The
return on those 130 hours is approximately $230,000 in direct economic savings,
$2.2 million in reduced personal exposure, and a banking relationship that has
migrated from a grade four to a grade three with a two-year commitment and a
capped guarantee.
The compound effect is not visible in any single renewal. It
is visible only when the arc is traced from year one to year ten. The question
is not whether the effort is worth it. The question is whether the borrower can
afford to operate without it.
Who This Book Is For
This book is for the owner-operator who has a commercial
banking relationship and has realized that the relationship is more complex,
more consequential, and more manageable than they previously understood.
It is for the CFO who has been managing the banking
relationship as one of many competing priorities and wants to convert that
reactive posture into a proactive one without adding more than four to six
hours per month of additional work.
It is for the controller who prepares the compliance
certificate and wants to understand what the numbers mean to the bank before
the bank's analyst sees them.
It is for the financial professional who advises commercial
borrowers and wants a reference work that covers the situations the standard
texts do not.
It is for the borrower who is about to sign a commitment
letter and wants to know which provisions are negotiable before the expiration
date forces a decision.
It is for the borrower who is in a covenant crisis and needs
a procedure they can execute today, not a theory they can study at leisure.
It is for the borrower who is planning to change banks and
wants to execute the exit in a way that preserves the option of return.
It is not for the first-time borrower who has never been
through a commercial credit process. That borrower should read the first book.
This book assumes the reader understands the system and is now looking for the
procedures that apply when the system is not enough.
What I Learned Writing It
Writing this book taught me three things that I did not
fully understand when I started.
The first is that procedure is more valuable than theory for
borrowers in stress. A borrower in a covenant crisis does not need to
understand the history of covenant architecture. They need to know what to do
in the next forty-eight hours. The procedural format of this book, with its
specific timelines and specific documentation requirements, is the format that
serves the borrower in the moment the situation arrives. Theory serves the
borrower in advance. Procedure serves the borrower on the day.
The second is that the compound effect of proactive
relationship management is larger than I expected. The two-borrower decade
comparison in the closing chapter was originally conceived as an illustrative
device. As I built the numbers, I realized the illustration was understated.
The actual compound effect, across borrowers I have observed, is larger than
the book suggests. The 130 hours of additional work produce more than $230,000
in savings and more than $2.2 million in reduced personal exposure. Those numbers
are conservative. The real numbers are higher, and they grow with the size of
the facility and the length of the relationship.
The third is that the bank's internal framework is more
consistent across institutions than I expected. The specific weights vary. The
specific definitions vary. The specific thresholds vary. But the categories,
the inputs, and the analytical logic are consistent enough that a borrower who
learns the framework at one bank can apply it at another. This consistency is
what makes the book generalizable rather than institution-specific. The
procedures are designed to work at any commercial bank, because the underlying
framework is the same at every commercial bank.
The First Book and the Second Book Together
The first book teaches the system. The second book teaches
the procedures. The two together are the complete toolkit.
The system without the procedures is analytical
understanding without operational capability. The borrower who understands the
system but cannot execute the procedures can diagnose the problem but cannot
solve it. The procedures without the system are tactics without a foundation.
The borrower who can execute the procedures but does not understand the system
can negotiate hard on the wrong terms.
The borrower who has both can do something that most
commercial borrowers never do. They can sit across the table from a
relationship manager and a credit officer and operate on the same analytical
framework the bank is using. They can present a credit package that anticipates
the bank's analysis. They can propose terms that are supported by the bank's
own arithmetic. They can negotiate from a position of documented preparation
rather than from a position of informational asymmetry.
That position is the one the bank always occupies. The
system and the procedures together give the borrower the ability to occupy it
too.
The meeting does not have to be over before it starts. Not
if the borrower has done the work.
What to Do Next
If you have read the first book, this book is the next step.
The system you learned in the first book is the foundation. The procedures in
this book are the toolkit that sits on top of it.
If you have not read the first book, you can start here. The
procedures are self-contained. But you will get more out of them if you
understand the system they sit on top of, and the first book is where that
system is explained.
If you are in a situation right now, a covenant crisis, a
renewal that is coming, a term sheet you are trying to interpret, a bank merger
that was just announced, open the book to the chapter that covers your
situation. The chapters are designed to be read in the order the situation
demands, not in the order they appear.
If you are not in a situation right now, start with Chapter
1. Run the score card. See where you stand. The score card takes forty-five
minutes and produces a number that tells you whether your relationship is
moving in the right direction or the wrong one. That number is the starting
point for everything else in the book.
The compound effect begins with the first quarterly score
card run. The 130 hours across a decade start with the first forty-five
minutes.
The book is available now. The link is below.
If you have questions, if you are in a situation the book
does not cover, if you want to share what you are seeing in your own banking
relationship, reach out. The email is casper@stackedcfo.com. I read
every message.
The first book was supposed to be enough. It was not. This
book is the rest of the story.
Comments